Pollen Compatibility Studies with European and Japanese Plums
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.1972.26.3.63Abstract
‘Valor’, ‘Verity’, ‘Vision’ and ‘Vineland’ selection ‘V. 33028’ plums were completely self-incompatible. Hand pollination showed that ‘Valor’ and ‘Verity’ were cross-compatible. ‘Valor’ and ‘Verity’ set fruit satisfactorily with ‘Vision’ pollen, but ‘Vision’ did not set well when pollinized by ‘Valor’ or, ‘Verity’. ‘V. 33028’ was cross-compatible with ‘Verity’ and ‘Vision’, but not with ‘Valor’. ‘Italian’, ‘Stanley’, and ‘California Blue’ were effective pollinizers for ‘Valor’, ‘Verity’ and ‘V. 33028’. ‘Bluebell’ was satisfactory for ‘Valor’, while ‘Iroquois’ was effective for ‘Verity’ and ‘V. 33028’.
‘Shiro’ set well with ‘Reine Claude’, ‘Methley’, ‘Myrobalan B’ and ‘0-3010’. ‘Early Golden’ and ‘Methley’ were satisfactory pollinizers for ‘Burbank’. ‘Shiro’ did not fertilize ‘Burbank’. ‘Ozark Premier’, ‘Myrobalan B’ and ‘0-3010’ were good pollinizers for ‘Burbank’ and ‘Early Golden’. ‘Early Golden’ set adequately with pollen from ‘Burbank’, ‘Santa Rosa’ and ‘Woodruff’.
Downloads
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The American Pomological Society and Editors cannot be held responsible for the views and opinions expressed by individual authors of articles published herein. This also applies to any supplemental materials residing on this website that are linked to these articles. The publication of advertisements does not constitute any endorsement of products by the American Pomological Society or Editors.