Black Ben Davis or Guno: A Question of Right, Truth and Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.1984.38.4.155Abstract
For two years at the turn of the century, a vehement argument raged across the Arkansas-Missouri border over the nomenclature of an apple. This battle called the "Gano-Black Ben Davis controversey," embroiled one of the country's largest nurseries (Stark Bros.) and the horticultural societies of what was then two of the nation's most important apple-producing states, Arkansas and Missouri. Profit, pride and patriotism were probably the motive forces behind the separate factions. The framework of the controversy was this: Arkansans contended that these were two distinct cultivars, while most of the Missourians claimed the two were the same. They also claimed "the right to name" based on the older and more-or-less traceable history of the Gano.
Downloads
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The American Pomological Society and Editors cannot be held responsible for the views and opinions expressed by individual authors of articles published herein. This also applies to any supplemental materials residing on this website that are linked to these articles. The publication of advertisements does not constitute any endorsement of products by the American Pomological Society or Editors.