Fruit Firmness, Calyx and Neck Ratings Correlated with Field Fruit Rot Reactions of Nine Strawberry Cultivars
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.1995.49.1.14Abstract
Fruit calyxes and necks were rated, and fruit epidermis toughness and flesh firmness were measured, for nine strawberry ( Fragariax ananassa) cultivars on four harvest dates during 1991. These data were correlated with percent of fruit with each of several rot diseases at harvest in 1991 and 1992. The cultivars differed significantly for all traits. 'Earliglow' and 'Tristar' had the most reflexed calyxes, and 'Earliglow' and 'Cardinal' had the most raised necks. 'Cardinal' and 'Allstar' had the greatest fruit flesh firmness and epidermis toughness. Greater fruit epidermis toughness did not correlate well with reduced levels of any fruit rot. Greater fruit flesh firmness correlated significantly, although not highly ( r= 0.26 to 0.37), with reduced anthracnose fruit rot (caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides(Penz.) Penz. & Sacc.), leather rot (incited by Phytophthora cactorum(Leb. & Cohn) Schrot.), and total rots during both years, but not with reduced gray mold (caused by Botrytis cinereaPers.:Fr.). Mid-season calyx ratings correlated significantly ( r= 0.39 to 0.50) with reduced leather rot, anthracnose and total rots during one year each. Both mid-season neck ratings, and the mean of mid-season calyx and neck ratings, correlated significantly ( r= 0.37 to 0.62) with reduced levels of all rots during both years, except for leather rot in 1992. Overall, the mid-season calyx-neck mean predicted rot levels the best of the fruit traits studied.
Downloads
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The American Pomological Society and Editors cannot be held responsible for the views and opinions expressed by individual authors of articles published herein. This also applies to any supplemental materials residing on this website that are linked to these articles. The publication of advertisements does not constitute any endorsement of products by the American Pomological Society or Editors.