Field Susceptibility of Scab-Resistant Apple Cultivars and Selections to Cedar Apple Rust, Quince Rust, and Frogeye Leaf Spot
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.1997.51.4.251Abstract
Thirty-seven scab-resistant apple cultivars and selections were evaluated in the field for level of susceptibility to cedar apple rust (CAR), Gymnosporangium juniperi-virginianaeSchw., quince rust (QR), G. clavipesCke. and Pk., and frogeye leaf spot (FLS), Botryosphaeria obtusa(Schw.) Shoemaker. Between 1994 and 1996, fruit infection from CAR varied from 0 to 40% for the various cultivars and selections. The selections originating from the Geneva, N.Y. breeding program were resistant to CAR or had low levels of fruit infection (0-3%). They also had low leaf rust ratings (0 to 0.3) except for NY 74828-12 which had leaf rust ratings of 0.2 to 1.3 (1-25 lesions per leaf) over the three years. The Quebec apple selections (QAS) from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, St. Jean, Quebec also had low levels of fruit infection from CAR (0 to 3%). However, several selections did have leaf rust lesions. Other cultivars and selections with field resistance to CAR included ‘Moira,’ ‘Novamac,’ ‘Redfree,’ ‘William's Pride,’ Co-op 26, O-637 and 547-25-52. QR infection varied from 0 to 31% with ‘Moira,’ CBR4T29, Co-op 24, QAS-04, QAS-11 and O-661 being most susceptible with fruit infection of 10% or higher. FLS occurred on all cultivars. Those with 5 or fewer lesions per leaf over the three years included ‘Dayton,’ ‘Jonafree,’ ‘Novaspy,’ CBR4T29, Co-op 12, Co-op 15, Co-op 19, Co-op 20, Co-op 24, QAS-01, QAS-03, NY 75414-1 and O-661. In this trial, QAS-01 and NY 75414-1 had combined resistance to all three diseases.
Downloads
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The American Pomological Society and Editors cannot be held responsible for the views and opinions expressed by individual authors of articles published herein. This also applies to any supplemental materials residing on this website that are linked to these articles. The publication of advertisements does not constitute any endorsement of products by the American Pomological Society or Editors.