Performance of Three Apple Cultivars on 19 Standard and Semi-Standard Rootstocks Over 10 Years
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.1998.52.4.200Abstract
In 1986 'Macspur Mclntosh,' 'Lawspur Rome Beauty,' and 'Redchief Delicious' apple trees on 19 standard and semi-standard rootstocks were planted at Ripley, OH. 'Macspur' produced the largest trees after 10 years, followed by 'Lawspur' and 'Redchief,' and the interaction between cultivar and rootstock for all factors measured was significant. MAC.24, B.490, MAC.4 and MAC.1 resulted in trees with larger TCA's than 'Macspur' on seedling rootstock, while 8 other rootstocks were similar in size to M.7 EMLA. Trees on MM.106 EMLA had larger TCA than 'Macspur'/MM.106, but EMLA status had no effect with M.7 or both rootstocks with the other cultivars. Trees of 'Lawspur' and 'Redchief on MM.106 EMLA were much smaller than 'Macspur' on MM.106 EMLA. B.118 was precocious with all 3 cultivars and 'Lawspur' was particularly precocious on P.13 and MM.106. The following rootstocks had higher cumulative yields/tree than 'Macspur'/seedling, while being similar in size: MAC.4, B.118, P.18, M.4 and MM.106 EMLA. The following had higher cumulative yields/tree than 'Lawspur'/seedling, while being equivalent in size: MAC.24, MAC.4, B.118, M.4, P.13. None of the rootstocks were superior to M.7, while several of the larger rootstocks, P.13, B.118, MM.106 and MM.111 were superior to seedling.
Downloads
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The American Pomological Society and Editors cannot be held responsible for the views and opinions expressed by individual authors of articles published herein. This also applies to any supplemental materials residing on this website that are linked to these articles. The publication of advertisements does not constitute any endorsement of products by the American Pomological Society or Editors.