Crop Yield, Fruit Quality, and Winter Injury of 12 Red-Fruited Wine Grape Cultivars in Northern Virginia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.2001.55.4.241Abstract
‘Charbono’, ‘Fer’, ‘Limberger’, ‘Mourvèdre’, ‘Nebbiolo’, ‘Petit Verdot’, ‘Refosco’, ‘Sangiovese’, ‘Syrah’, ‘Tannat’, ‘Valdepeñsí, and clones FPMS #6 and #7 of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ were evaluated at Winchester, Virginia for components of crop yield, fruit chemistry, and dormant bud cold hardiness over seven crop years. All cultivars were trained to bi-lateral cordons and spur-pruned, except that spurpruning and cane-pruning were compared with ‘Nebbiolo’ in the last four years. Based on consistent, high fruit quality, and on cold hardiness at least comparable to ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ the cultivars ‘Fer’, ‘Mourvèdre’, ‘Petit Verdot’, and ‘Tannat’ were recommended for commercial consideration in Virginia. Very high crops (± 10 kg/vine, or 12.8 t/ha) were achieved with ‘Charbono’, ‘Limberger’, ‘Refosco’, and ‘Sangiovese’, all of which were associated with large (> 2.0 g/berry) berries, and relatively dilute soluble solids concentration (SSC) and flavors. ‘Nebbiolo’ fruit averaged 23 °Brix, but fruit color intensity and flavors were mediocre. ‘Syrah’ and ‘Valdepeñas’ fruit quality were occasionally good, but not consistently so. All cultivars produced more vegetative growth (> 0.5 kg cane prunings per m of canopy) than desirable, and all would be considered cold-tender in northern Virginia.
Downloads
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The American Pomological Society and Editors cannot be held responsible for the views and opinions expressed by individual authors of articles published herein. This also applies to any supplemental materials residing on this website that are linked to these articles. The publication of advertisements does not constitute any endorsement of products by the American Pomological Society or Editors.