Performance of ‘Gala’ Apple on Four Semi-Dwarf Rootstocks: A Ten-Year Summary of the 1994 NC-140 Semi-Dwarf Rootstock Trial

Authors

  • R.P. Marini Author
  • B.H. Barritt Author
  • G.R. Brown Author
  • J. Cline Author
  • W.P. Cowgill Jr. Author
  • R.M. Crassweller Author
  • P.A. Domoto Author
  • D.C. Ferree Author
  • J. Garner Author
  • G.M. Greene Author
  • C. Hampson Author
  • P. Hirst Author
  • M.M. Kushad Author
  • J. Masabni Author
  • E. Mielke Author
  • R. Moran Author
  • C.A. Mullins Author
  • M. Parker Author
  • R.L. Perry Author
  • J.P. Privé Author
  • G.L. Reighard Author
  • T. Robinson Author
  • C.R. Rom Author
  • T. Roper Author
  • J.R. Schupp Author
  • E. Stover Author
  • R. Unrath Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.2006.60.2.58

Abstract

In 1994, trees of ‘Gala’ apple ( Malus x domesticaBorkh.) on 4 semi-dwarf rootstocks were planted at 20 locations in North America according to the guidelines established for cooperative testing by the North Central Regional Cooperative Project (NC-140). The four rootstocks were P.1, V.2, G.30, and M.26 EMLA. Four of the locations did not receive trees on P.1 rootstock. Tree losses were greatest for G.30. Trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA) was generally largest for P.1 and smallest for G.30. TCSA was most variable for M.26; at some sites, trees on G.30 had larger trunks than trees on M.26. Tree height was usually greatest for P.1 and tree spread was usually smallest for M.26 EMLA. Although results were not consistent for all sites, yield and yield efficiency tended to be highest for G.30 and lowest for P.1. Although the effect of rootstock was not consistent, cumulative yield efficiency tended to be lower for G.30 than for M.26 or V.2. Trees on P.1 and G.30 produced the most root suckers.

Downloads

Published

2006-04-01

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

How to Cite

Performance of ‘Gala’ Apple on Four Semi-Dwarf Rootstocks: A Ten-Year Summary of the 1994 NC-140 Semi-Dwarf Rootstock Trial. (2006). Journal of the American Pomological Society, 60(2), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.2006.60.2.58

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>