Performance of the 2002 NC-140 Cooperative Peach Rootstock Planting

Authors

  • S. Johnson Author
  • R. Andersen Author
  • W. Autio Author
  • T. Beckman Author
  • B. Black Author
  • P. Byers Author
  • J. Cline Author
  • C. Chavez-Gonzalez Author
  • W. Cowgill Author
  • R. Godin Author
  • G. Greene Author
  • M. Kaps Author
  • J. Kamas Author
  • H. Larsen Author
  • T. Lindstrom Author
  • D. Miller Author
  • M. Newell Author
  • D. Ophardt Author
  • D. Ouellette Author
  • R. Parra-Quezada Author
  • R. Pokharel Author
  • G. Reighard Author
  • T. Robinson Author
  • J. Schupp Author
  • L. Stein Author
  • K. Taylor Author
  • C. Walsh Author
  • D. Ward Author
  • M. Warmund Author
  • M. Whiting Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.2011.65.1.17

Abstract

In 2002, a peach [ Prunus persica(L.) Batsch] trial consisting of eight rootstocks was planted at 17 sites in the United States, Canada and Mexico. �Redhaven� was the scion at ten sites and �Cresthaven� at the other seven sites. The rootstocks tested were Adesoto 101, Mr.S.2/5, Penta, Krymsk�2 (VSV-1), Krymsk�1 (VVA-1), Pumiselect�, Cadaman� and Lovell. After five years, trees on Cadaman� were similar in size and productivity to Lovell. Pumiselect � and Krymsk�2 exhibited many problems with survival, suckering and fruit weight. Adesoto 101, Mr.S.2/5 and Penta all showed potential as semi-dwarfing rootstocks although mortality and suckering were excessive at some sites. Krymsk�1 showed potential as a dwarfing rootstock with a trunk cross-sectional area 35% of Lovell. Trees on Krymsk�1 rootstock also had fruit weight equal to the more vigorous rootstocks and had the highest yield efficiency.

Downloads

Published

2011-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

How to Cite

Performance of the 2002 NC-140 Cooperative Peach Rootstock Planting. (2011). Journal of the American Pomological Society, 65(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.2011.65.1.17

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>