Leaf and Fruit Mineral Nutrient Partitioning Influenced by Various Irrigation Systems in 'Fuji' Apple over Four Years
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.2015.69.3.137Keywords:
fruit minerals, irrigation, leaf nutrients, water deficiencyAbstract
Increasing water shortage crises, meshed with an increasing demand for newer cultivars, higher orchard density, and different canopy architectures mandates the study of the impact of various irrigation systems and rates of water application on tree growth, fruit quality, yield, and mineral partitioning. In a long-term study between 2004 and 2007, use of crop evapotranspiration (ETc), when a precise crop coefficient value (Kc) was used, provided a reliable tool (irrigation scheduling) for determination of the water requirement for ‘Autumn Rose Fuji’ apple ( Malus× domesticaBorkh). In this process, the crop coefficient was modified by percentage of ground shade (GS) and tree canopy maturity (M). Application of water at full ET rates through a full sprinkler (FS) or full drip (FD) system increased the size of tree canopy and leaf area and increased yield per tree and leaf K but reduced leaf Mg and Zn. Application of irrigation through a FS system decreased percentage of dry matter in the fruit but increased leaf Cu concentration and is potentially a preferred method for areas with Cu deficiency. Leaf Ca concentration in trees with a FS system was higher than those with a FD system but no significant differences were found among different irrigation systems in fruit Ca concentrations. A greater volume of water was delivered to trees under full-micro-jet sprinkler systems than those with drip systems. However, application of water through a drip system, calculated based on full ETc rate and adjusted for ground cover, resulted in major water saving and often improved yield.
Downloads
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The American Pomological Society and Editors cannot be held responsible for the views and opinions expressed by individual authors of articles published herein. This also applies to any supplemental materials residing on this website that are linked to these articles. The publication of advertisements does not constitute any endorsement of products by the American Pomological Society or Editors.