Performance of 'Montmorency' Sour Cherry ( Prunus CerasusL.) on Size-Controlling Rootstocks at Six NC-140 Trial Locations in North America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.2019.73.3.168Keywords:
dwarfing, tart cherry, yield efficiency, vigor, precocity, NC-140 trial, rootstock suckerAbstract
‘Montmorency’ sour (aka tart) cherry ( Prunus cerasusL.) was budded to 11 potentially size-controlling clonal rootstocks plus the standard Mahaleb seedling rootstock at a commercial nursery, grown for one year, then planted in 1998 at six locations in North America under the auspices of the NC-140 Regional Research project. Eight replicate trees on each rootstock were planted at each site (Michigan, New York, Ontario, Pennsylvania, Utah, and Wisconsin). The planting in Pennsylvania was terminated in 2002. The remaining sites continued to collect data through 2007. Significant differences between rootstocks were found for their effects on tree mortality, tree size, root suckering, cumulative yield, cumulative yield efficiency and fruit size within and among the various trial sites. Trees on P. cerasus rootstock genotypes varied in scion vigor, ranging from some of the smallest (Edabriz, W.53) to some of the largest (W.10, W.13). Trees on interspecific hybrid rootstocks ranged from dwarfing (Gi.3) to semi-vigorous (Gi.195/20, Gi.6). No rootstock genotype conferred the best performance across all measured characteristics and all locations. Overall, the highest cumulative yields were on Mahaleb, W.10 and Gi.6. The highest mortality was on W.53, followed by Gi.195/20 and G.7, all of which have been found to be sensitive to pollen-borne viruses such as Prune Dwarf and Prunus Necrotic Ringspot. This high mortality should eliminate further commercial consideration of these rootstocks. Extensive root suckering was noted with W.13, W.10 and G.7 at several sites, suggesting that their potential for commercial production should be considered carefully in those sites, especially if mechanized harvest will be with newer over-the-row equipment rather than traditional trunk-shaking machinery.
Downloads
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The American Pomological Society and Editors cannot be held responsible for the views and opinions expressed by individual authors of articles published herein. This also applies to any supplemental materials residing on this website that are linked to these articles. The publication of advertisements does not constitute any endorsement of products by the American Pomological Society or Editors.