Rootstock Effects on Growth and Fruiting of a Spur-Type and a Standard Strain of Delicious Over Eighteen Years
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.1999.53.2.115Abstract
Red Prince, a standard strain and Redchief (Campbell strain), a spur-type strain of Delicious apple were grown on several rootstock/interstock combinations for 18 years. The dwarfs were Malling 9 (M.9), M.26, M.9/Malling Merton 106 (MM.106), and M.9/M M.111. The semi-dwarfs were M.7, MM.106, and MM.111. Five three-tree replications were used. In-row spacing was varied from 1.8 to 5.5 m depending on the scion/interstock/rootstock combination; between-row spacing was 6.1 m throughout the experiment. Tree survival ranged from a high of 100% for five combinations to as low as 13% for both Delicious strains on MM.106. In the dwarf group, trees of both strains on M.26 were the largest, those on M.9/MM.111 were intermediate, and those on M.9 and M.9/MM.106 were the smallest. The greatest numbers of rootsuckers were on trees on M.9/MM.111 and M.7. Crop density tended to be higher with Redchief than Red Prince and higher in the dwarf than semi-dwarf group. With both Redchief’ and Red Prince, cumulative per-tree yields were greater on M.26 than on M.9 or M.9/MM.111. Trees of Redchief on the three semi-dwarf rootstocks yielded similarly; Red Prince trees on MM.111 out-yielded trees on M.7. With both strains, trees on M.9 and M.9/MM106 tended to have higher cumulative yield efficiencies than those on M.26 or M.9/MM.111. Cumulative yields (T/ha) for both strains were highest for trees on M.26 compared to all other rootstocks. Cumulative yields for the three semi-dwarf rootstocks differed little with either scion.
Downloads
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The American Pomological Society and Editors cannot be held responsible for the views and opinions expressed by individual authors of articles published herein. This also applies to any supplemental materials residing on this website that are linked to these articles. The publication of advertisements does not constitute any endorsement of products by the American Pomological Society or Editors.