Comparison of Methods to Express Growth, Size, and Productivity of Apple Trees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71318/apom.2001.55.4.251Abstract
Data from an 18-year rootstock trial with ‘RedChief’ and ‘Red Prince’ strains of ‘Delicious’ and ‘Goldspur’ and ‘Smoothee’ strains of ‘Golden Delicious’ were used to compare multiple ways to express tree productivity and efficiency. Our data confirm the close relationship between trunk cross-sectional area (TCA) and scion weight across a wide range of tree sizes. In addition, our data show that cumulative yield increased at a decreasing rate as tree size increased, whether expressed on the basis of scion weight or TCA. The regression between pruning time and TCA was linear for both strains of both cultivars. The cumulative crop-weight-to-final-scion-weight ratio (C/S ratio) varied widely with rootstock, but much less with cultivar and strain. Trees on M.9 rootstocks had a C/S ratio of about 15, indicating that the average annual production of fruit for each of the 14 fruiting years was equal to the final scion weight. With M.7 and MM.111, the annual yields of fruit were equal to about 50% of the final scion weights. The relative differences in C/S ratio were considerably greater than the cumulative yield efficiencies reported earlier.
Downloads
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The American Pomological Society and Editors cannot be held responsible for the views and opinions expressed by individual authors of articles published herein. This also applies to any supplemental materials residing on this website that are linked to these articles. The publication of advertisements does not constitute any endorsement of products by the American Pomological Society or Editors.